Hey there fellow time wasters. As is well known, I take my reality television seriously. Well, if not always seriously, at least
obsessively.
Today I'll offer a brief primer into my favorite kind of reality show that does not include commentary from a snarky Brit, stoned ex-cheerleader, and portly catch phrase spouter...
Reality Food shows.
Top Chef (Bravo)
This is the top of the Reality Food heap in just about every regard. Bravo knows how to produce reality shows like nobody's business, as that's just about the entirety of their original programming any more.
Unlike most other Reality Food shows, the emphasis here is truly upon finding a great chef. Through all the weird challenges and curveballs thrown at the contestants by the producers this show actually does a pretty good job at keeping the focus on the food. They look for quality, originality, knowledge of ingredients and cooking skills, and the ability to adapt to most any situation.
The commentary and criticism offered by the judges is frequently insightful even when it's devastating. The judging panel is chaired by Tom Colicchio, a real chef with as serious cheffing credibility as one could hope for. The challenges often get goofy but the judging in the end always brings it back to making great food.
The other nice quality of this show is that it does a good job screening for chefs with real talent. No other reality food show comes close to the level of cooking skill shown by the cheftestants on Top Chef. That said, being a Bravo show, there is always plenty of drama in the personality interplay of the cheftestants. Somewhat Big Brother like, all these chefs are sequestered together in a house, isolated from the rest of the world. It gets a bit claustrophobic and tense as the pressure builds at times. That gives the show its heroes and villains; it's comedians and drama queens. Consequently, by the end of the season there are serious fan favorites here to an extent not seen on other Reality Food shows.
If you watch only one Reality Food show, this is the one to choose.
Hell's Kitchen (Fox)
While the promotions for this show focus on host/chef Gordon Ramsay's profanity and insults, that's not really all this show is about. But it's also not really about the food - at least not much. This show is about the ability to work in and eventually run a top caliber kitchen under high pressure and with the highest standards. The interest is in seeing which contestants can't handle the pressure as the orders pile up, which don't have the cooking skills, and which can't handle the criticism. Anyone who has actually worked in a real restaurant will be able to attest that they may exaggerate the experience, but it's close enough to the real thing to draw real lessons from it.
Ramsay himself seems to hold all the contestants in utter contempt initially. The ones who make it about half way through begin earning his grudging respect. And by the end he transforms into a proud poppa effusive in praise for whomever manages to win. Imagine a boot camp complete with barking drill instructor intent on breaking down his recruits only to build them up again as proper soldiers... only set it in a kitchen and lose the weakest member each day until only one is left. That's Hell's Kitchen.
The contestants here are a mixed bag, apparently by design. There's always a couple of professional chefs tossed in with caterers, hobbyists, line cooks, and personal chefs.
It's a decent show if you have interest in how to run a restaurant kitchen, or want to learn creative new insults (I never realized calling someone a "donkey" could sound so demeaning); but it's not too deep on the food side.
Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares (Fox)
Because of the success of Hell's Kitchen, Fox brought one of Gordon Ramsay's other BBC shows over to America, Kitchen Nightmares. The premise of the show is simple: Find a restaurant going out of business, bring in Gordon Ramsay for a week to try to turn it around, let the drama and hillarity ensue. Sometimes this works well. Sometimes it's almost painful to watch.
It should be noted that the BBC version of this show is quite a bit better than the Fox version. Fox, typical to stereotype, emphasizes anything with shock value, and lays on the family drama very thickly. This takes screen time away from the actual restaurant turnaround process. Fox also gives Ramsay the unrealistic advantage of several thousand dollars of cash to invest in the restaurant to help turn it around, which is something not many restaurants struggling to survive have lying around. The more understated BBC version didn't do this, and it made for a more compelling and real feeling show as a result.
Anyway, Ramsay is a wildly successful restaurateur, and this show demonstrates that a lot more goes into that than simply being a good chef. The restaurants chosen come in most any sort, from burgers to fine dining to ethnic cuisine. It doesn't really matter what style of food they're trying to sell as this is a show about how to run a
business that happens to be a restaurant. Major emphasis on the business side distinguishes this from the rest of the Reality Food world. Also, this one is not a contest show. The "prize" is in the attempt to keep the restaurants from bankruptcy.
There's plenty of excellent advice offered here that many a restaurant owner should find helpful. That said, Ramsay definitely has his own preferences that come through as a bit cookie-cutter when you've watched enough of these.
The Next Food Network Star (Food Network)
You would think that if anyone "gets" how to make a compelling Reality Food show it would be this network. You would think that and you would be wrong. Half of the reason I watch this show is to see how badly they've mangled the contest angle here considering their ostensible goal of finding a "star" to give an actual television show to. Because this show is so bad at doing this, you wouldn't know that they've gone through four seasons already. Stars produced? One. Guy Fieri. And if you watched that season you realize he only narrowly made it, even though it was completely obvious he was the only one with any star potential in the lot.
And that's the thing that is so frustrating about this show. Based on the kind of challenges that form the basis of the show you'd think they're looking for someone who can cook excellent food really, really fast; and also able to improvise well in totally unfamiliar situations with no forewarning; and someone who can entertain a live audience; and someone who can innovate brand new dishes with unfamiliar ingredients upon demand. But in the end you find the winner doesn't apply any of that. The winner gets a show... a
taped, half hour cooking show. They don't have to whip up things they don't know how to make. They know perfectly well what their set and equipment will be. They don't have a live studio audience. They don't have to start and finish a single dish in an alloted time. So how the heck to most off the challenges they put the contestants to even apply toward finding their "star"? They mostly don't.
And that makes this the most pointless and confused of the whole Reality Food world. Best leave this one alone unless you're really desperate for entertainment. I watch it so you don't have to.